The new Apple announcements. (341 words)
edit: One great thing about today’s announcements: at least we won’t have to hear about how Apple will/should switch to Intel or AMD for at least, say, a week or so. ;)
:: Dave Walker 20:41 (EST/EDT) [+] ::
:: [/tech/computers/os/osx/apple]
:: tags: apple
:: Comments (3)
Comments:
Title: not convinced
Date:
'worlds fastest personal computer' is pure hokum. I doubt that in any real world test it would be noticeably faster than a comparably priced PC.
I think OSX is pretty sweet -- as I said elsewhere, it's everything Linux wants to be except free. Portable OSX would be great; as it is, the Mac you buy to run it is basically a big copy protection dongle.
To be fair -- again -- if you compare apples to apples -- so to speak -- I priced out as similar a Dell Dual Processor machine, and it came out very close in price to a similar G5
Title: Safari 1
Date:
As Safari has been declared version 1.0 and thus ready for prime time now, it's time to take a...
Title:
Date:
Kent -- The "world's fastest" hooey -- hey, it's marketing, and you know what that means. In real world terms, it means the "macs are so slow blah blah" argument goes out the wind. I do "general purpose" computing, which means that a machine that does the usual things (rendering web pages, compiling source, running Java apps) faster is a good thing to have, but I'm certainly not one of those psychos sitting in front of a copy of Photoshop with my stopwatch. As far as supporting generic x86 boxes, I've yet to hear a single, credible business model for it that makes sense for Apple. They would instantly magnify their support costs by a factor of (2,3,4?) and put themselves directly in Microsoft's crosshairs, and for what? So that folks who, if we're being honest, don't like spending money on software (your average Linux geek) can run it on some box of boards? It'll never happen, especially now that Apple's got competitive hardware again.
Software, n.: Formal evening attire for female computer analysts.